Why 19th-Century Naturalists Didn’t Believe in the Platypus

image.jpg

George Shaw’s depiction of a duck-billed platypus from 1809. (Photo: New York Public Library)
In his laboratory study in 1799, biologist George Shaw stared down at his new specimen in disbelief. The creature from the colony of New South Wales came preserved in pungent alcohol, and he carefully snipped the thick, brown pelt around the creature’s beak, sure he would soon reveal the stitches where an expert taxidermist had fused the bird and beast together. It was like nothing he had seen before: the creature had the body of a furry brown cat, four short legs and sharp claws over webbed feet; the tail of a beaver, but the beak of a duck. [read more]

 

Advertisements
Tagged with: ,
Posted in Classification, DRAFT - Repeat

by Hugh McLeod

Follow LIS 653 Knowledge Organization on WordPress.com
Pratt Institute School of Information
%d bloggers like this: